In a recent virtual meeting about the importance of instructional feedback, I noted how we often overlook the importance of timely, structured, and contextual feedback in the interest of professional development. Feedback can be powerful. Feedback can’t be a receipt or takeaway note if the goal is collaboration, dialogue, or any sort of coaching, mentoring, or even observational communication. Feedback can also be problematic when it’s unsolicited or even unwelcome. In our edusphere, and in my coaching role, it’s important to have a clear vision on effective feedback methods, and the concept of a feedback loop is powerful for meaningful collaboration and communication.
Feedback is often one-directional. In-game coaching, course feedback forms, or even rubrics are examples of a one-directional feedback source. A rubric isn’t feedback, at least if it’s delivered as an end-of-project receipt or scorecard. I’ve never really seen a student pour over the squares in which their work has been scored in order to collect any new information.
A feedback loop is a different story. A loop isn’t directional; it implies dialogue or conversation. There’s input and output. Interestingly, as a musician, it’s critical to avoid feedback loops at all costs, in which inputs and outputs become imbalanced. That’s the danger zone where one source overwhelms the other. There’s a clear lesson to be found for administrators, team-members, and instructional coaches! A balanced, ongoing, and monitored exchange can create a meaningful model for learning and growth.
A loop is cyclical, which can be a good or a bad thing. A positive loop spirals and strengthens, where a negative loop can reinforce bad habits and damage relationships. If you’ve been teaching long enough, you’ve likely seen or experienced either of these types of feedback loop.
Whether it’s directional or in a loop, feedback should carry context for if the goal is growth. Observations shouldn’t be able to be easily misinterpreted, and information and data should be actionable. Feedback shouldn’t feel transactional. It should feel informative, whether the news is good or bad. Sometimes feedback is automatic. In fact, some of the most immediate changes occur in response to negative feedback, whether it’s a microphone squeal, a dog’s snarl, or a spiraling student.
It’s our job to turn that information into action. Coders take unsuccessful attempts in stride to debug their programs, musicians move their microphones or shift their levels, and skilled educators adjust their practice to respond and react to the formative feedback in front of them. Mechanisms like forms and surveys collect data or work as a dipstick to capture a moment for a classroom teacher or building administrator. In these instances, real-time feedback can provide real-time adjustment in the form of formative feedback.
Feedback in the form of performance assessments, reviews, or even course grades have big strings attached and are quite different from the types of feedback in formative meetings, brainstorming sessions, or peer observations. Each type of feedback serves it’s specific purpose, but it’s critical that all parties understand the types of language, criteria, and evaluative measures in place if the feedback has any hope of being effectively applied to practice.
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Feedback and Loops
Wednesday, January 19, 2022
Why Wordle?
Quick post for a quick game: Wordle
It takes a minute to learn, a few minutes to play, and you get only one! At its simplest, it's hangman + Mastermind. You have to solve a five letter mystery word by guessing letter, and your only help is instant feedback indicating correct letter or correct letter and place.
If you've read my blog, you already know my affinity for classic logic/strategy board games in the classroom, particularly those the employ computational thinking strategies. Games that require sequence, strategy, logical reasoning, or algorithmic thinking add context for students’ understanding of computational thinking beyond coding tasks. Exploring and identifying how parts of a system, game, or program, relate, connect, and combine build foundational concepts for later computational thinking construction. The thinking skills that make Wordle challenging and fun intersect with CT in the same way as solitaire puzzles, Mastermind, or peg-board games. Worlde is a funny combination of logic, pattern strategy with a vocab twist!
It's a curious strategy to only provide one puzzle per day, and perhaps some paid platform will emerge, but it's refreshing to complete (or not) one short puzzle and carry on with the rest of the day. There's no rabbit hole.
In terms of its popularity, I can't remember a simpler and more contagious digital game. I'm not sure where I land on everyone sharing their results. Is it obnoxious? I don't think so. It's informative and impermanent, and if I solved a puzzle in 2 or three steps, I'd probably shout about it, too. It's a fun and fleeting phenomenon, but I will admit to being impressed and curious at seeing how well others across social media tackled a particular puzzle.
The shared results are also interesting, as anyone who has played the game can instantly decode each others' game-play in a simple, single icon. If you see their chart, you know their process. In fact, I've found myself looking at others' early attempts at guessing the word to try to figure out their guesses. Anyone else? Maybe this is a clever classroom idea to try...
As an educator, I see immediate applications, and I imagine kicking off lessons with today's Wordle, designing Wordle races, or creating lessons for students to design their own wordle challenges for each other.
What will you come up with?
Monday, October 25, 2021
4 C's for Post-Pandemic Learning
There has been a lot of talk about learning loss and "catching up" in the news and media. However, during these first few months of our new school year, the topics of conversations I'm hearing across schools are very different. Educators are far less concerned about specific content skills, chapters, or material, and more focused on students, their social-emotion health, and their ability to focus, take turns, or "do school."
For the past 20 years, we've been talking about the 4 Cs of 21st century learning: Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking and Creativity. This lens has reshaped the way instruction has looked across many classrooms, including my own practice. I adjusted much of my instructional practice when thinking about designing activities and experiences that promote these 4 C's for a more engaged classroom and authentic teaching and learning environment. Thinking about designing instruction, experiences, and spaces, with a focus on communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity fundamentally changed who I was as an educator in and out of the classroom.
4 C's of Post-Pandemic Learning
As we return to something far less than normal, I'd suggest we need to look toward a new set of C's for a post-pandemic landscape. We need to nurture Connection, Compassion, Culture and Climate. While the "first 4 C's" provide a framework for looking closer at instructional practice, these "new 4 C's" address how well and ready our students feel to put these practices into action. Together, both sets of C's can work collaboratively from an instructional viewpoint as well as a social-emotional perspective to strengthen Agency, Empathy, and Empowerment in our students. These are emotional competencies all educators want to help their students develop. Fostering a learning environment where educators can design and deliver instruction through a lens of connection, compassion, culture, and climate will help promote and strengthen these competencies.
My universe is elementary, but if the upper grades are anything like our K-5 experience, words like agency, empathy, and empowerment are not at the top of our lists when describing students' current experience.
Student agency is a buzzword that has been hard to define in terms of what it looks like, but seems easier to identify when missing. I'd suggest that’s exactly what we find our students missing when the rituals and routines of daily classroom activities become problematic. I have heard countless descriptions of executive-functioning breakdown, short-fused refusals, or constant challenges with things like waiting turns, navigating the cafeteria, or working together. The social-emotional opportunity loss far outweighs any measurable (but equally educational) content, and deserves equally deliberate and focused attention if we are serous about "catching up" the whole child.
Social-emotional learning and executive functioning are two clear examples of focus areas and buzzwords in our business. For all of the SEL focus and available professional development, there almost has to be a back-to-basics foundational focus in order to take those next-level SEL steps. How can we have a conversation about students' ability to employ effective executive functioning strategies when their environment, routines, and instructional environment has been continually adapting to changing guidelines, initiatives, and expectations? Can our climate handle the culture shifts we are demanding?
🔗Connection
Now more than ever, it's all about relationships. Relationships develop trust, encourage risk-taking through partnership and support, and create pathways to communicate for (and about) learning. It's no surprise that connection was the first and fastest loss when shifting to remote, then hybrid, and even still in our modified environments. It's not just about masks and spacing, it's about the play, the small group or 1:1 closeness, and especially the cafeteria, snack, and recess where students work out the social dynamics of childhood.
💙Compassion
It's easy to say (and easy to see) that students are struggling, but so are classroom teachers, support staff, and specialists. Just being in our buildings is no return to normal, and I think we all underestimated the lagging toll this past two years has taken, and will continue to take, on the social emotional health of our learning community. For every student we see pop on the surface, it's safe to assume there are a handful with less visible struggles that we need to attune to before we can ratchet up the content demands, or we will only enhance the struggle.
🏫Culture
Culture is often described as the values and norms of a school or system. It's the structure that determines how values and beliefs transfer toward an environment of learning. This is the staff, the tone, the sights, and the sounds of a school. It's the hallways, playgrounds and staff rooms. It's the messaging on the walls and cafeteria. When we look at the challenge of deploying initiatives at a district or building level, whether it's new content-curriculum or the work of diversity/equity/inclusion, it's the culture that can impact how well any initiative will succeed, and the expression of how well stakeholders feel about their culture (and efforts to shape it) creates the climate.
🌡Climate
Climate is the temperature of a shared space. Where culture focuses on the way things have always been done; climate is actions and behaviors that demonstrates feelings among students and staff. The frequent comparison is that climate refers to the way people feel about school, while culture is defined by the way people act in a school.
There’s a relationship among these 4 C's. Connection is a byproduct of compassion. Building relationships and employing empathy throughout our buildings develops an environment that cultivates relationships and builds connections. Similarly, climate is a reflection and expression of culture. If we want to shift the perceptions, feelings, and emotional temperature that reflect the climate of our community, we need to examine the values, routines, and rituals that identify its culture.
While the line between culture and climate can be blurry, it's clear to see that our sets of values and norms, as well as our behaviors and feelings about teaching and learning in the past two years, have been put to the test. Just like we preach, we need to analyze the data, adjust our approach, and leverage what we've learned if we're serious about learning and growth.
Tuesday, August 10, 2021
Back to School '21: Lessons Learned
My annual back to school post has been an interesting mile-marker these last few years. Between diving into a new district and watching our working world turn upside down from COVID, these posts have been as much about looking (and thinking) back as much as they’ve been about the excitement and anticipation that September always brings. In that spirit, the theme to this year’s back to School post is Lessons Learned.
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Hybrid Learning: We’re Gonna Need a Bigger Boat
🧭This school year’s return to learning in a hybrid format launched our collective journey- our great Voyage of Discovery. What have we discovered so far? Some tools work better than others, nothing about our business is well-suited to a sudden remote shift and, while teaching is exhausting and depleting in a normal year, teachers have found another gear to meet the ever-evolving needs of their districts, schools, and learners. But to make it last... “We’re gonna need a bigger boat.“ Hoist the sails and batten down the hatches for a metaphor-rich adventure!

















